If you are an importer and buying from Asia, specifically China, you hear a lot more about Peak Season Surcharge (PSS), General Rate Increase (GRI), Bunker Adjustment Factor (BAF), etc compared to the other countries. Sometimes these constant additions and changes in the market are unclear and do not make much sense to importers. One of the most challenging aspects of importing from Asia is the constant uncertainty of the rates. It is a tedious process as an importer, if you are planning 3 months in advance and having to work out pricing for your customers while keeping in mind the upcoming increases—or better yet not knowing what these increases will be. In this article, with my professional experience I would like to dig deeper and analyze the reasons behind the uncertainty.
Why can’t I have 3 months of valid rates? Is it really good to have rates with that have an extended validity? I have been receiving these similar questions for several years from importers and I have tried to help them understand the bigger picture of the reasons behind the quick and sudden changes in freight rates. If you are a small to medium sized importer and do not have a logistics team–you may find yourself wasting time trying to keep up with the rates instead of promoting your goods to your customers. In order to help you save that time, I hope to clarify these constant and sudden changes.

In my expertise, I composed the following list of the main reasons why rates keep changing:
1- Fixed costs of the steamship lines: The biggest cost item for steam ship companies is fuel. Oil prices have been increasing steadily since February 2009. Although, supply and demand govern oil prices, there are also other reasons behind this. Whether it may a geopolitical risk, decline in the value of the dollar, and of course the volatility in the countries where the oil comes from. There is a constant volatility in oil prices and because it is the biggest cost item for steamship lines, they are affected by these increases and therefore reflect them unto their freight prices. In some cases, steamship lines will announce increases through quarterly BAF amounts, while others adjust it monthly. According to the Marine Bunker Exchange, one ton of 380 cSt bunker fuel bought in Rotterdam by the end of March 2012 would cost USD704. This is 300% more than the price of USD172 per ton at the end of 2008, which is substantial change.
2- Aggressive capacity cuts: Transpacific trade is crowded. Along with all major carriers, there are also many niche carriers serving in this trade. Although many of the carriers are eliminated through time, there are still many remaining vessels going back and forth between China and US costs. Simple economics states that if there is too much supply in the market, prices need to come down eventually. However, this does not always apply to the shipping industry (I am not including 2009’s drastic rate decrease here). Steamship lines have learned their lesson in 2009-2010, when they lost hundreds of millions of dollars. When rates start to come down, there are capacity cuts. Let’s say 100 vessels are serving between Shanghai and Los Angeles, and there are 1000 containers of goods needing to be imported. You are paying $1000 for the container rate. When the number of vessels increases to 200, due to new entries, new service openings, and new steamship lines, but because of the slack in the market the number of containers will not stay in that same 1000 price range. The price will begin to come down because more carriers will be willing to carry the goods for a cheaper rate to get a market share. In order to eliminate this, carriers cut the capacity. Enough capacity cut will drive the rates to higher levels. So far active fleet has grown by 1.9% in 2012 and is expected to grow 7.9% for the full year

3- Shipping cycle: Shipping cycle starts with a shortage of ships and increase in the freight rates. This leads to excessive order of the ships by the steamship lines. The delivery of new ships leads to more supply in the shipping capacity–this is tricky and my colleague and VP Of Business Development, Can Fidan, has done a profound analysis in his blog article, which can also be found here. If ships are not invested in, but the trade grows there will be a shortage of ships and therefore lost profits. If ships are invested in but the trade does not grow, this will complicate the market more and pull the prices down. Considering that it takes years between the decision of making a new ship and when it starts to serve in the market, a lot of analysis and consideration is invested in new ships. The shipping cycle is a mechanism to coordinate supply and demand, and has a total of 4 stages which are trough, recovery, peak and collapse.
4-Desire to make profit: As all businesses’, steamship lines have to make profit in order to continue their existence. Therefore, whenever there is an opportunity, the market will attempt to implement increases in the rate.
5-Speculations: No steamship line will want to lose the opportunity to increase their profit and keep/increase their market share. The market is under watch, and if a few carriers start to drop their rates, others will usually follow. The market leaders are the large carriers and their decisions are usually taken as the indicator. Speculations affect the rates much faster than any other item I listed in this article.
6- Political reasons: Government’s intervention in the shipping industry use trade policies to protect home-made products against foreign goods. Wars, revolutions, national crises, strikes, etc are all political factors that affect the rates.
7- World economy: Decrease and increases in the world’s output affects the freight rates. After 9/11, world output decreased and led to a reduction in both global import and export, which resulted in freight fluctuations.
These are only some of the major reasons behind freight rate changes. So next time, there is a change in the market- keep these in mind. Also check with your forwarder or designated carrier from time to time, to see what the expectations are in the upcoming weeks. Do not forget, that if you are searching for rates that have long term validity, you might be losing the opportunity of saving in freight rates when the rates come down in the time frame that you were quoted for. Therefore, although rates with long validty seem to be a good deal in the beginning, it might not always be the best idea. This is a cycle; every now and then there may be times where the freight rates skyrocket but there will also be times it will have a downward tendency. No matter how hard the steamship lines try artificial increases, in the end free market will win.






Look closer tuel costs, they have come down considerably in the past several months – and no one says much about it. Are they higher than in 2008? Sure; but they are lower by 20% plus the last several months.
The rates are market driven, period. Supply/demand ratios pretty much dictate rate levels; the overcapacity we see today creates the rate environment for pressure on rates as all carriers strive to fill the last box. At Peek/peak season rates do climb – for some cargo interests not all.
But the real reason that rates fluctuate is the market – the market sets the rates.
Hi Gary,
Completely agree and thanks for your comment. The market surely sets the rates eventually however until it happens we will keep seeing the attempts to manipulate the rates. No matter how hard it is tried, if market is not good it is almost impossible to keep the rate levels on higher levels. Maybe for one vessel, two vessels increases might go through but eventually market will set the rates..
Thanks,
Dear Mr.Serkan,
Thanks to the article in a simple language which can be digested to any layman too .Very Good!!
Hope you might have read the White paper published by Drewry on the container rate contracts – Index Linked Container contracts. it’s worth reading.
Manohar
Dear Manohar,
I am glad you liked the article.
When you talk of carriers cutting capacity, that is not something that is easy to do. Carriers have a fleet of ships and there are fixed costs incurred on each vessel even if they are not operational such as depreciation, interest cost, wages to be paid to crew, maintenance costs etc. These costs remain even if the ship is not operational. Given this situation, it makes sense for the carrier to operate the ship even at reduced freight rates as long as they can at least cover the fixed and variable costs of operation. Further cutting capacity cannot be done by an individual shipper and each carrier may want the other carriers to cut back on their capacity expansion. This situation is like the OPEC cartel trying to cut back oil production. Though each member has a quota, in fact most members pump crude above their quotas hoping that others will cut back. There is a famous story about an Emperor who ordered his subjects to fill his pool with milk. Each one of his subjects poured water into the pool as his share expecting the others to pour milk and hoping that no one will notice that he poured water because it will get mixed with the milk. The end result was that everyone poured water instead of milk and the pool was filled with water instead of milk.
Dear Serkan,
Although I am new to this area but you explained so well that newcomers to this field can understand this as well